HMRC Tax Investigations officials are entitled to investigate a tax return after the usual one-year limit has passed if their discovery assessment letter meets one of two tests, according to a recent Court of Appeal ruling that reaffirms a long-established power for the taxman.

Derek Hankinson v HM Revenue & Customs focused on whether HMRC used a section section 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 correctly when it investigated the taxpayer’s Self Assessment return for the 1998-99 tax year – six years after it was filed.

In 2005 HMRC assessed Hankinson’s tax return for 1998-99 and concluded he owed £30m in income tax and capital gains tax for the year because he was still a resident in the UK for tax purposes, despite having moved to the Netherlands.

Hankinson lost appeals against HMRC’s assessment of his tax liabilities in the first-tier and upper-tier tribunals.

In the Court of Appeal Hankinson challenged HMRC’s use of section 29 that was used to investigate his tax return for 1998-99.

HMRC usually has one year after a Self Assessment tax return is delivered to challenge and investigate it.

Under section 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (at the time of the case), however, HMRC can investigate tax returns after the one-year window by sending a discovery assessment letter if one of two conditions apply. Firstly, the full and accurate facts were not available to HMRC officers due to incomplete disclosure, negligence or fraudulent behaviour by the taxpayer or agents; secondly the HMRC officer completing an enquiry could not have reasonably been expected to have been aware of the loss of tax.

In a judgment published in December last year Lord Justice Lewison concluded that HMRC’s use of section 29 was valid.

A new HMRC unit, the Offshore Co-ordination Unit (OCU), based in Birmingham, has written to tax advisers as part of its ongoing attack on offshore tax evasion. The unit recently sent out letters where HMRC believes that a tax adviser has clients who have, or have had, offshore bank accounts or investments. This is believed to be part of HMRC’s ongoing project into account-holders with HSBC in Geneva, following the receipt of stolen data containing details of UK taxpayers with accounts there. Further letters will be sent out in the coming weeks and months, as HMRC work their way through the information held.

The strongly-worded letters give tax advisers advance warning that HMRC will be contacting their clients (within a short time period). The letters indicate that the client will be given an opportunity to make a full disclosure in advance of HMRC starting an investigation into their tax affairs.

Advisers should treat any such letter seriously, and immediately contact their client. Those who have undisclosed liabilities need to act quickly, to prevent an intrusive HMRC investigation, or, potentially, criminal proceedings. Caution should be observed where the client claims to be compliant in relation to the offshore account to ensure that there are not any undeclared liabilities.

In December 2009,  HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) stated that they had identified 800 Hospital Consultants it wished to launch a tax investigation into  and of its intention to initiate an amnesty. The Tax Health Plan (THP) was subsequently launched.

The THP raised over £10 million through over 1500 disclosures, with an individual payment of over £1 million by a doctor and over £300,000 by a dentist.

HMRC has now announced that it has begun 500 enquiries and 6 criminal investigations since the THP closed.

The dispute between HMRC and Hospital Consultants concerning what constitutes their business base for mileage purposes continues to run. A Tribunal case is due to be heard this summer, although it is understood that it involves a geriatrician, rather than the more representative Hospital Consultant undertaking a combination of NHS and private practice work at regular locations. So watch this space because it isn’t only these high profile cases that employers need to be aware of there is also the real danger that employees and Directors are claiming travel & subsistence costs incorrectly as they have not identified a persons permanent/temporary workplace. We are here to help you with this exercise so call us today on 0800 9179176 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0800 9179176 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

A £158BN hole in the public finances means that HMRC are being used to try and raise extra cash for the Treasury, as quickly as possible and that will mean easy targets, so small and medium size firms, anyone in the construction industry are in the direct firing line for:

employer compliance reviews

PAYE/NIC investigations

Employment status reviews

tax investigations

you name it and they are heading your way and don’t think it won’t happen to you – it will, so why not take advantage of the special deal that EICG is running this month on PAYE/NIC healthchecks and Construction Industry reviews, call us today on 0800 917 9176 to see how we can help you avoid being a victim

The current delays within HMRC are getting ridiculous and it’s not just the taxpayers that are having problems, even professional tax advisers are having problems.

Sue Moore, associate director for BTT and A, has been struggling to get hold of anyone at HMRC.

“We’re having difficulties when dealing with the HMRC. It would seem that most offices are eight weeks behind dealing with post. When you telephone it is just the call centre and if you want to speak to somebody actually dealing with the case, that is almost impossible. All this was before the cuts in the department spending.

Everybody is affected by the delay. Issues take longer to resolve and cost the clients more in professional fees as we have to keep chasing HMRC. Working on a case is very inefficient as we have to pick up the threads of the case after several months’ delay.”

Now we are finding that we are having to escalate matters in order to get a response to correspondence which is no good for anyone

HMRC are planning a massive increase in the take from: tax investigations, employer compliance review, tax enquiries, employment status reviews and CIS reviews, so you have been warned

HMRC plans to seize an extra £4bn in 2010/11 through more aggressive tax investigation work and tougher powers. To achieve such a high yield, HMRC will need to widen the scope of its enquiry work to include marginal cases. This increases the risk innocent businesses are caught up in a massive fishing exercise

Tax investigations can be hugely costly to taxpayers in respect of management time, stress and advisory fees, while much of the tax HMRC claws in through investigations is not tax that has been deliberately evaded, in many cases it is the result of HMRC reinterpreting tax law and this brings in the well known scenario of my pockets are deeper than yours – otherwise known as if an individual or business can’t afford to challenge HMRC’s decision through the tribunals and court system, then HMRC wins.

So you have been warned, take specialist advice before it happens to you

It has now been a year since HMRC introduced the internal review system which was intended to be a bridge between the case worker and the First Tier Tribunal in cases such as tax investigations, employment status cases and HMRC penalties to name but a few areas. Initially viewed with suspicion, and still to a certain extent, HMRC have published figures on the process to date.

Unrepresented tax payers have been relatively enthusiastic to use the system, probably on the basis of what have they got to lose – this made up 81% of those using the system. There are however strong distinctions to be drawn between automatic penalty cases where approximately half were cancelled compared with those that are far more substantiative. Even the latter category showed that about 25% were either cancelled or varied – so there is a definite moral here – don’t reject the internal review system out of hand it can be a useful process if dealt with correctly you just need to make sure the person dealing with your case understands the process. So, if you need advice call us today on 0800 917 9176

HMRC have recently published details of their internal review of tax enquiries, employer compliance reviews, tax investigations etc in relation to cases that have occurred since 1 April 2009 which does make for interesting reading:

“Outcomes excluding penalty cases 3,443 cases out of 18,526

Upheld: review complete – 2,603 (76 per cent)
Deemed Upheld: time limit expired – 20 (1 per cent)
Varied – 349 (10 per cent)
HMRC decision cancelled – 471 (14 per cent)

Outcomes penalty cases 15,083 cases out of 18,526

Upheld: review complete – 6,281 (42 per cent)
Deemed upheld: time limit expired – 48 (0 per cent)
Varied – 793 (5 per cent)
HMRC notice cancelled – 7,961 (53 per cent)”

In basic english this means that 24% of non penalty cases were varied or cancelled and a staggering 58% of penalty cases were varied or cancelled

The results clearly show that it is in your interest whether you are an individual or a company (where there is reason to doubt HMRC’s assessment) to complain. We would also add that it is advisable to obtain specialist help when HMRC comes a calling, it’s not a time to dabble so give us a call on 0800 917 9176

There are still a number of individuals and companies out there that think the Inland Revenue won’t pursue them to the ends of the earth regarding tax debts – you need to wake up, seriously!

HMRC compliance visits and tax investigations take on real significance when you focus on HMRC’s mission to maximise tax take, as such its stated litigation settlement strategy (LSS) aims to push for a full settlement or court action if it believes it has a better than 50/50 chance of winning.

Now the issue is always the fact that HMRC have deep pockets when it comes to arguements, you only have to look at some of the employment status cases that have taken 3/5 years to conclude but the cost in terms of money, time and effort expended by HMRC (and delayed cash flow for the government’s coffers – this is most likely the issue) in pursuing these disputes is mounting.

Therefore some in HMRC are considering using a more “common sense” approach – can it be possible?

A new unit would split the dispute resolution unit from the anti avoidance division. The mission of the new unit would be to resolve the disputes more quickly; thus improving cash flow, even if the speedier resolution means a lower tax bill – I can’t see that being popular within HMRC, can you? So stick with the principle of getting things as correct as possible in the first place and if you’re not sure give us a call on 0800 917 9176 as a PAYE/NIC healthcheck could save your company, in more ways than one!

The way HMRC carry out the following, are going to change beyond recognition:

• Employer compliance reviews
• Tax investigations
• Tax enquiries
• PAYE/NIC investigations
• PAYE investigations

and if you’re not up to speed it’s going to be a real shock to the system. If you’re advisor is unaware then be really concerned and give EICG a call on 0800 917 9176 to see how we can help you: before and during a visit.

HMRC Cross tax reviews is just one example of this, so moving away from potentially three visits in a year to a visit combining PAYE/NIC, VAT and Corporation tax. For very large businesses this has been trialling with a team of HMRC officials visiting (oh what joy) and is based on extensive reviews of other tax systems across the world. However, this is likely to be cascaded downwards to other sizes of business with the use of a newly retrained general tax practitioner – as you can imagine this has pro’s and cons as anyone who deals with a specialist area of tax knows it is just that, specialist and not generalist, so my advice is don’t let someone “have a go” on your behalf use specialists, as we have at EICG to cover these areas.

Keep on reading for further updates on what is an ever changing Inland Revenue approach to solving the national debt!