The recent Supreme Court judgment in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and Others (UKSC 41) backed a group of self-employed car valets who worked for Autoclenz and argued that clauses in their contracts did not reflect their actual working arrangements. In spite of clauses on mutuality and substitution, the court ruled that they were obliged to provide the services personally. The legal dispute started in 2007.

The Supreme Court decision establishes a precedent that the conduct of the contractual parties could override the written terms.

In its ruling the Court said decided that the contracts did not reflect the true agreement between the parties and that in reality “four essential contractual terms were agreed: (1) that the valeters would perform the services defined in the contract for Autoclenz within a reasonable time and in a good and workmanlike manner; (2) that the valeters would be paid for that work; (3) that the valeters were obliged to carry out the work offered to them and Autoclenz undertook to offer work; and (4) that the valeters must personally do the work and could not provide a substitute to do so.”

This case highlights the importance for all parties to ensure that they have seen the contract of services and agree that it reflects the true working practices of everyone involved. The court stated that only one party needed to claim that a clause in the contract did not reflect their intentions in order for the clause to be considered a sham.

If you have any self employed people contact us today to ensure that your current arrangements reflect this new opinion, on 0800 917 9176

The letter will explain that, once the opportunity expires, the tax authorities will begin a clampdown on those working in the sector who have failed to declare earnings and pay the tax they owe.

Under the tax plan, plumbers, gas fitters, heating engineers and members of associated trades who owe tax which they have not yet declared can come forward anytime up to 31 May to tell HMRC they want to take part. If they make a full disclosure, most face a low penalty rate of 10 per cent, with a maximum of 20 per cent. Once they come forward, they have until 31 August to make their disclosure and arrange for payment.

After that date, using information pulled together from different sources, HMRC will investigate those who have failed to come forward. Substantial penalties or even criminal prosecution could follow.

The Plumbers’ Tax Safe Plan (PTSP) is the first initiative in a campaign focused on tradespeople. It is designed to make it easy for those in the plumbing industry to put their tax affairs in order.

Mike Wells, HMRC’s Director of Risk and Intelligence, said:

“Our aim is to make it easy for plumbers to contact us, make a full disclosure of income and face a reduced penalty.

“We are using a variety of intelligence sources to target plumbers who have not declared their full income and I urge tradespeople in this group who think they owe tax on their income to get in touch with HMRC and get their tax affairs in order simply and on the best available terms.

“The first step for those wishing to avoid a full tax investigation with much higher penalties is to notify us.

“We do not think everyone who receives a letter owes us tax. However, if you owe tax and don’t get a letter, do not assume that HMRC will not catch up with you.”

To join the tax plan people in the plumbing industry must:

* Register with HMRC to “notify” that they plan to make a voluntary tax disclosure by 31 May
* They then have until the 31 August to tell HMRC about tax due and make arrangements to pay any tax interest and penalties due. This is called “making a disclosure”.

Please be aware that before you launch forth with this “offer” from HMRC you should consult a specialist telephone 0800917 9176 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0800917 9176 end_of_the_skype_highlighting

In order to maintain the confidentiality of a contractor’s monthly return HMRC have introduced further security checks to ensure that the corrections made are proper to a particular return and that the revised details have been recorded correctly.

What does this mean?

If you telephone the CIS contact centre you may be asked for other details shown on the original return that now requires amendment. You should therefore ensure that you have a copy of the original return before making the phone call.

If you send an amended return to Netherton then you may be contacted by the CIS centre in Newry asking you to confirm the period to which the corrections/additions relate.

If you write a letter to the CIS centre in Newry, once again you may be contacted either by telephone or in writing asking for confirmation of the amendments.

HMRC are now out and about big style as they have told their Inspectors to bring in as much money as possible, as quickly as possible, which is not really surprising given the current economic environment.  There will be pressure to settle long running full enquiry cases and Inspectors will be encouraged to take up aspect cases (these are as they sound, looking at a particular aspect of a business, eg employment status, entertaining expenditure etc ) which are likely to be settled more quickly to optimise the tax yield in the current fiscal year.

Interestingly, it would appear that the new “Cross Tax” enquiry framework, involving PAYE/NIC, Corporation Tax, VAT etc is being shelved as it is slowing up the enquiry process so Inspectors will be reverting to just working their particular area

It has now been a year since HMRC introduced the internal review system which was intended to be a bridge between the case worker and the First Tier Tribunal in cases such as tax investigations, employment status cases and HMRC penalties to name but a few areas. Initially viewed with suspicion, and still to a certain extent, HMRC have published figures on the process to date.

Unrepresented tax payers have been relatively enthusiastic to use the system, probably on the basis of what have they got to lose – this made up 81% of those using the system. There are however strong distinctions to be drawn between automatic penalty cases where approximately half were cancelled compared with those that are far more substantiative. Even the latter category showed that about 25% were either cancelled or varied – so there is a definite moral here – don’t reject the internal review system out of hand it can be a useful process if dealt with correctly you just need to make sure the person dealing with your case understands the process. So, if you need advice call us today on 0800 917 9176

At last the results of the consultation exercise into false self employment in the construction industry have been published and we have summarised the more salient details below:

• Nothing is going to happen yet and nothing will happen until the industry picks itself up, certainly not before the Olympics in 2012

• The simplistic approach of the government having three tests has been widely criticised and they have conceded that further consultation will be required – no surprises there then

• There is also a lot of criticism that any simplistic approach away from case law is only being geared at the Construction Industry, what about other industry sectors?

• The government have indicated that they will look into organisations purporting to get round the rules such as umbrella companies, managed service companies and labour style agencies – this type of compliance is no bad thing as they are so blatantly flouting the rules and taunting HMRC (never a good idea for them or more importantly their clients)

• Interestingly, the Trade Unions aren’t happy as they could potentially see a lot of new members but the government proposals actually mean that although subcontractors would suffer PAYE/NIC they would not be regarded as “employees” but “deemed employees” which means that they would have no employment rights or benefits. This has been widely criticised because it would actually create “false employment” and the employment law side of this has not really been addressed

• There is a General Election due, probably around 6^th May, which could mean a different party in power. The Conservatives have not indicated that they will pursue what is effectively a witch hunt in the Construction Industry

So if you have self employed subcontractors and would benefit from an employment status review call us on 0800 917 9176