<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EICG &#187; Construction Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eicg.co.uk/tag/construction-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eicg.co.uk</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court overturns self-employed status at Autoclenz</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/supreme-court-overturns-self-employed-status-at-autoclenz/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/supreme-court-overturns-self-employed-status-at-autoclenz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Tax Experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false self employment in the construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self employed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcontractor status]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eicg.co.uk/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent Supreme Court judgment in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and Others (UKSC 41) backed a group of self-employed car valets who worked for Autoclenz and argued that clauses in their contracts did not reflect their actual working arrangements. In spite of clauses on mutuality and substitution, the court ruled that they were obliged to provide the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recent Supreme Court judgment in <strong><a href="http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2011/41.html" target="_blank">Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher and Others</a></strong> (UKSC 41) backed a group of <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/employment-status" class="broken_link">self-employed</a> car valets who worked for Autoclenz and argued that clauses in their contracts did not reflect their actual working arrangements. In spite of clauses on mutuality and substitution, the court ruled that they were obliged to provide the services personally. The legal dispute started in 2007.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court decision establishes a precedent that the conduct of the contractual parties could override the written terms.</p>
<p>In its ruling the Court said decided that the contracts did not reflect the true agreement between the parties and that in reality “four essential contractual terms were agreed: (1) that the valeters would perform the services defined in the contract for Autoclenz within a reasonable time and in a good and workmanlike manner; (2) that the valeters would be paid for that work; (3) that the valeters were obliged to carry out the work offered to them and Autoclenz undertook to offer work; and (4) that the valeters must personally do the work and could not provide a substitute to do so.”</p>
<p>This case highlights the importance for all parties to ensure that they have seen the contract of services and agree that it reflects the true working practices of everyone involved. The court stated that only one party needed to claim that a clause in the contract did not reflect their intentions in order for the clause to be considered a sham.</p>
<p>If you have any self employed people contact us today to ensure that your current arrangements reflect this new opinion, on 0800 917 9176</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/supreme-court-overturns-self-employed-status-at-autoclenz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HMRC increase Post Scanning</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/hmrc-increase-post-scanning/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/hmrc-increase-post-scanning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Tax Experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC Post Scanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eicg.co.uk/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documents relating to tax enquiries and employer compliance checks on employers will now be scanned electronically by HMRC staff in an attempt to improve its service. A single PO Box address and case reference will be used to identify the mail that is scanned. HMRC said it plans to scan documents from a “large majority” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Documents relating to tax enquiries and <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk" class="broken_link">employer compliance checks</a> on  employers will now be scanned electronically by HMRC staff in an attempt  to improve its service.</div>
<div><a href="http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/changes-incoming-mail-golive.htm"><strong> </strong></a></div>
<div>A single PO Box address and case reference will be used to identify  the mail that is scanned. HMRC said it plans to scan documents from a  “large majority” of its compliance checks during 2011-12.</div>
<div></div>
<div>“Scanning the incoming mail will mean that the documents and  letters received will be linked to the customer case record and  available to caseworkers within 36 hours, it will also help to reduce  the risk of post going astray,” HMRC said.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Tax advisers have long complained about the time it takes HMRC to  respond to postal enquiries and confirm receipt of documents. <a href="http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/group/hmrc-working-together-e-group/summary-thread-postal-contact" class="broken_link"><strong> </strong></a> HMRC’s stance on postal tax return submissions suffered a blow in  February, when a first tier tax tribunal upheld a taxpayer’s appeal  against an HMRC penalty for a late tax return.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The <a href="http://www.financeandtaxtribunals.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=5347" target="_blank"><strong>Heronslea v HMRC</strong></a> appeal  (TC00978) was over a Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) tax return due  on 19 June 2010 that HMRC claimed did not arrive until 22 June.  Heronslea director Michael Clifton appealed the £100 penalty and told  HMRC he had posted the return (along with other documents) in good time  because he was going away on holiday.</div>
<div>
<div>Tribunal judge Anne Redston noted previous episodes where the  taxpayer struggled to get the department to send forms to his correct  address. She also noted the absence of any mail logging at the HMRC  office.</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/hmrc-increase-post-scanning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Construction Industry (CIS) Review offer</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/construction-industry-cis-review-offer/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/construction-industry-cis-review-offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC/CIS Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business record check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business records check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false self employment in the construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in year business record check]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eicg.co.uk/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EICG are offering a menu of Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) reviews for your company at special rates until 30 June 2011 HMRC are being very proactive in this area, even for companies that have previously been under the radar. You could be caught out whether this be via an employer compliance review, an employment status [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EICG are offering a menu of Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) reviews for your company at special rates until 30 June 2011</p>
<p>HMRC are being very proactive in this area, even for companies that have previously been under the radar. You could be caught out whether this be via an employer compliance review, an <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk/employment-status" class="broken_link">employment status review</a> or an in year business records check. The costs of getting things wrong can be monumental, not just the penalties but also the time taken out of your business and the resulting stress that this can cause.</p>
<p>So why wait, choose your review option below and contact us today on<span class="skype_pnh_print_container">0800 9179176</span><span class="skype_pnh_container" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_mark"> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting</span> <span class="skype_pnh_highlighting_inactive_common" title="Call this phone number in United Kingdom with Skype: +448009179176" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_left_span"> </span><span class="skype_pnh_dropart_span" title="Skype actions"><span class="skype_pnh_dropart_flag_span" style="background-position: -2001px 1px ! important;"> </span> </span><span class="skype_pnh_textarea_span"><span class="skype_pnh_text_span">0800 9179176</span></span><span class="skype_pnh_right_span"> </span></span> <span class="skype_pnh_mark">end_of_the_skype_highlighting</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Employment status review of your subcontractors and associated paperwork</li>
<li>Review of all aspects of your Construction Industry compliance</li>
<li>Business record checks</li>
<li>Full <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk" class="broken_link">Employer compliance review</a>, as HMRC would conduct them</li>
</ul>
<p>Make your company the one that HMRC walks away from rather than feasting on your hard earned profits.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/construction-industry-cis-review-offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Investigations &#8211; HMRC turns up the heat on plumbing industry</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/tax-investigations-hmrc-turns-up-the-heat-on-plumbing-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/tax-investigations-hmrc-turns-up-the-heat-on-plumbing-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas fitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plumbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcontractor status]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eicg.co.uk/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 50,000 plumbers, gas fitters and heating engineers will start receiving letters this month from HM Revenue &#38; Customs (HMRC) alerting them to the chance to take advantage of a special time-limited tax plan to put right any gaps that might exist in their tax affairs or face a tax investigation. The letter will explain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>About 50,000 plumbers, gas fitters and heating engineers will  start receiving letters this month from HM Revenue &amp; Customs (HMRC)  alerting them to the chance to take advantage of a special time-limited  tax plan to put right any gaps that might exist in their tax affairs or face a <a href="http://www.eicg.co.uk" class="broken_link">tax investigation</a>.</p>
</div>
<p>The letter will explain that, once the opportunity expires, the  tax authorities will begin a clampdown on those working in the sector  who have failed to declare earnings and pay the tax they owe.</p>
<p>Under  the tax plan, plumbers, gas fitters, heating engineers and members of  associated trades who owe tax which they have not yet declared can come  forward anytime up to 31 May to tell HMRC they want to take part. If  they make a full disclosure, most face a low penalty rate of 10 per  cent, with a maximum of 20 per cent. Once they come forward, they have  until 31 August to make their disclosure and arrange for payment.</p>
<p>After  that date, using information pulled together from different sources,  HMRC will investigate those who have failed to come forward. Substantial  penalties or even criminal prosecution could follow.</p>
<p>The  Plumbers’ Tax Safe Plan (PTSP) is the first initiative in a campaign  focused on tradespeople. It is designed to make it easy for those in the  plumbing industry to put their tax affairs in order.</p>
<p>Mike Wells, HMRC&#8217;s Director of Risk and Intelligence, said:</p>
<p>“Our aim is to make it easy for plumbers to contact us, make a full disclosure of income and face a reduced penalty.</p>
<p>“We  are using a variety of intelligence sources to target plumbers who have  not declared their full income and I urge tradespeople in this group  who think they owe tax on their income to get in touch with HMRC and get  their tax affairs in order simply and on the best available terms.</p>
<p>“The first step for those wishing to avoid a full tax investigation with much higher penalties is to notify us.</p>
<p>“We  do not think everyone who receives a letter owes us tax. However, if  you owe tax and don&#8217;t get a letter, do not assume that HMRC will not  catch up with you.”</p>
<p>To join the tax plan people in the plumbing industry must:</p>
<p>* Register with HMRC to “notify” that they plan to make a voluntary tax disclosure by 31 May<br />
*  They then have until the 31 August to tell HMRC about tax due and make  arrangements to pay any tax interest and penalties due. This is called  “making a disclosure”.</p>
<p>Please be aware that before you launch forth with this &#8220;offer&#8221; from HMRC you should consult a specialist telephone <span class="skype_pnh_print_container">0800917 9176</span><span class="skype_pnh_container" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_mark"> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting</span> <span class="skype_pnh_highlighting_inactive_common" title="Call this phone number in United Kingdom with Skype: +448009179176" dir="ltr"><span class="skype_pnh_left_span"> </span><span class="skype_pnh_dropart_span" title="Skype actions"><span class="skype_pnh_dropart_flag_span" style="background-position: -2001px 1px ! important;"> </span> </span><span class="skype_pnh_textarea_span"><span class="skype_pnh_text_span">0800917 9176</span></span><span class="skype_pnh_right_span"> </span></span> <span class="skype_pnh_mark">end_of_the_skype_highlighting</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/tax-investigations-hmrc-turns-up-the-heat-on-plumbing-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amendments to a Construction Industry Return</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/amendments-to-a-construction-industry-return/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/amendments-to-a-construction-industry-return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cis returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcontractor status]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eicg.co.uk/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to maintain the confidentiality of a contractor’s monthly return HMRC have introduced further security checks to ensure that the corrections made are proper to a particular return and that the revised details have been recorded correctly. What does this mean? If you telephone the CIS contact centre you may be asked for other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to maintain the confidentiality of a contractor’s monthly return HMRC   have introduced further security checks to ensure that the corrections made   are proper to a particular return and that the revised details have been recorded   correctly.</p>
<p>What does this mean?</p>
<p>If you telephone the <a href="http://eicg.co.uk/employment-status" class="broken_link">CIS</a> contact centre you may be asked for other details   shown on the original return that now requires amendment. You should therefore   ensure that you have a copy of the original return before making the phone   call.</p>
<p>If you send an amended return to Netherton then you may be contacted by   the CIS centre in Newry asking you to confirm the period to which the corrections/additions   relate.</p>
<p>If you write a letter to the CIS centre in Newry, once again you may be   contacted either by telephone or in writing asking for confirmation of the   amendments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/amendments-to-a-construction-industry-return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Construction Industry Penalty regime</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/new-construction-industry-penalty-regime/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/new-construction-industry-penalty-regime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC/CIS Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractors monthly CIS return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eicg.co.uk/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very quietly HMRC have announced that there is a new CIS penalty regime being brought in. From October 2011, the penalties for late or non-filing of a contractor&#8217;s monthly return within the Construction Industry Scheme are changing. The first return falling within the new penalty regime will be the return for the month ending 5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very quietly HMRC have announced that there is a new CIS penalty regime being brought in.</p>
<p>From October 2011, the penalties for late or non-filing of a contractor&#8217;s            monthly return within the Construction Industry Scheme are changing.</p>
<p>The first return falling within the new penalty regime will be the            return for the month ending 5 November 2011.</p>
<p>The following penalties will apply to that return and all subsequent            months&#8217; returns that are not filed or filed late:</p>
<ul>
<li> A fixed penalty of £100 immediately a return is late.</li>
<li> A second, fixed penalty of £200, two months after the filing date              if the return is still outstanding.</li>
<li> If the return is still outstanding six months after the issue of              the first penalty, a tax-geared penalty is charged which is the greater              of £300 or 5% of the amount of deductions shown on the return.</li>
<li> If the return is still outstanding twelve months after the issue              of the first penalty, a further tax-geared penalty is charged which              is the greater of £300 or 5% of the amount of deductions shown on              the return. Higher levels of penalty apply where, as a result of the              failure to file the return on time, information has been deliberately              withheld.</li>
</ul>
<p>Interest will be chargeable on any penalty paid late.</p>
<p>The legislation for the change is at schedule 55 Finance Act 2009.</p>
<p>Paragraph 13 of Schedule 55 to Finance Act 2009 introduces a penalty            capping provision. The fixed penalties within the capping period will            not exceed a maximum of £3,000. The capping period starts on the day            of commencement (the date the contractor advises HMRC that they will            first pay, or have first paid, a subcontractor) until the date they            first file a CIS monthly return. Tax-geared penalties of 5% of the amount            of deductions shown on the returns will also apply in the capping period            where the return is submitted over 6 and 12 months late. There will            be no fixed minimum charge of £300 when the capping period applies.</p>
<p>Mistakes can be expensive so contact <a href="http://eicg.co.uk/tax-investigations" class="broken_link">EICG</a> on 0800 917 9176 to find out about our Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) reviews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/new-construction-industry-penalty-regime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HMRC inspections to rise in order to collect more tax</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/hmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/hmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC/CIS Penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC inspections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC healthchecks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC PENALTIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A £158BN hole in the public finances means that HMRC are being used to try and raise extra cash for the Treasury, as quickly as possible and that will mean easy targets, so small and medium size firms, anyone in the construction industry are in the direct firing line for: employer compliance reviews PAYE/NIC investigations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A £158BN hole in the public finances means that HMRC are being used to try and raise extra cash for the Treasury, as quickly as possible and that will mean easy targets, so small and medium size firms, anyone in the construction industry are in the direct firing line for:</p>
<p>employer compliance reviews</p>
<p>PAYE/NIC investigations</p>
<p>Employment status reviews</p>
<p>tax investigations</p>
<p>you name it and they are heading your way and don&#8217;t think it won&#8217;t happen to you &#8211; it will, so why not take advantage of the special deal that EICG is running this month on PAYE/NIC healthchecks and Construction Industry reviews, call us today on 0800 917 9176 to see how we can help you avoid being a victim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/cis/hmrc-inspections-to-rise-in-order-to-collect-more-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HMRC Tax Compliance &#8211; be very aware!</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-tax-compliance-be-very-aware/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-tax-compliance-be-very-aware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HMRC - what are they up to?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax compliance visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC healthcheck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE/NIC investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax enquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-advice-blog/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are still a number of individuals and companies out there that think the Inland Revenue won&#8217;t pursue them to the ends of the earth regarding tax debts &#8211; you need to wake up, seriously! HMRC compliance visits and tax investigations take on real significance when you focus on HMRC&#8217;s mission to maximise tax take, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still a number of individuals and companies out there that think the Inland Revenue won&#8217;t pursue them to the ends of the earth regarding tax debts &#8211; you need to wake up, seriously!</p>
<p><a href="http://eicg.co.uk/tax-investigations" class="broken_link">HMRC compliance visits </a>and tax investigations take on real significance when you focus on HMRC&#8217;s mission to maximise tax take, as such its stated litigation  settlement strategy (LSS) aims to push for a <strong>full settlement or court  action</strong> <strong>if it believes it has a better than 50/50 chance of winning.</strong></p>
<p>Now the issue is always the fact that HMRC have deep pockets when it comes to arguements, you only have to look at some of the <a href="http://eicg.co.uk/employment-status" class="broken_link">employment status</a> cases that have taken 3/5 years to conclude but the cost in terms of money, time and effort  expended by HMRC (and delayed cash flow for the government&#8217;s coffers &#8211; this is most likely the issue)  in pursuing these disputes is mounting.</p>
<p>Therefore some in HMRC  are considering using a more &#8220;common sense&#8221; approach &#8211; can it be possible?</p>
<p>A new unit would split the dispute resolution unit from the anti avoidance division. The  mission of the new unit would be to resolve the disputes more quickly;  thus improving cash flow, even if the speedier resolution means a lower  tax bill &#8211; I can&#8217;t see that being popular within HMRC, can you? So stick with the principle of getting things as correct as possible in the first place and if you&#8217;re not sure give us a call on 0800 917 9176 as a PAYE/NIC healthcheck could save your company, in more ways than one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/hmrc-what-are-they-up-to/hmrc-tax-compliance-be-very-aware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Status in the Construction Industry update</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/employment-status-in-the-construction-industry-update/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/employment-status-in-the-construction-industry-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer compliance review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status indicator tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment status reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false self employment in the construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC tax investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYE investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self employed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcontractor status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-advice-blog/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last the results of the consultation exercise into false self employment in the construction industry have been published and we have summarised the more salient details below: Nothing is going to happen yet and nothing will happen until the industry picks itself up, certainly not before the Olympics in 2012 The simplistic approach of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last the results of the consultation exercise into false self employment in the construction industry have been published and we have summarised the more salient details below:</p>
<ul>
<li>Nothing is going to happen yet and nothing will happen until the industry picks itself up, certainly not before the Olympics in 2012</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The simplistic approach of the government having three tests has been widely criticised and they have conceded that further consultation will be required &#8211; no surprises there then</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>There is also a lot of criticism that any simplistic approach away from case law is only being geared at the Construction Industry, what about other industry sectors?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The government have indicated that they will look into organisations purporting to get round the rules such as umbrella companies, managed service companies and labour style agencies &#8211; this type of compliance is no bad thing as they are so blatantly flouting the rules and taunting HMRC (never a good idea for them or more importantly their clients)</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Interestingly, the Trade Unions aren’t happy as they could potentially see a lot of new members but the government proposals actually mean that although subcontractors would suffer PAYE/NIC they would not be regarded as “employees” but “deemed employees” which means that they would have no employment rights or benefits. This has been widely criticised because it would actually create “false employment” and the employment law side of this has not really been addressed</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>There is a General Election due, probably around 6<sup>th</sup> May, which could mean a different party in power. The Conservatives have not indicated that they will pursue what is effectively a witch hunt in the Construction Industry</li>
</ul>
<p>So if you have self employed subcontractors and would benefit from an <a href="http://eicg.co.uk/employment-status" class="broken_link">employment status review </a>call us on 0800 917 9176</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/employment-status-in-the-construction-industry-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inland Revenue penalty madness</title>
		<link>http://eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/inland-revenue-penalty-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/inland-revenue-penalty-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brenda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS late filing penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIS penalties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HMRC penalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eicg.co.uk/tax-advice-blog/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s obviously the season for HMRC penalty madness, whether it be in respect of the Construction Industry with CIS late filing penalties or self assessment penalties, half a rain forest is being wasted in incorrect paper penalties. However, HMRC have stated that it is no longer the computer that is at fault (I always mistakenly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obviously the season for HMRC penalty madness, whether it be in respect of the <a href="http://eicg.co.uk/employment-status" class="broken_link">Construction Industry</a> with CIS late filing penalties or self assessment penalties, half a rain forest is being wasted in incorrect paper penalties. However, HMRC have stated that it is no longer the computer that is at fault (I always mistakenly thought a human had to programme/operate a computer but no, they have a mind and life all of their own!), instead it is human error caused by a lack of following procedure. Now anywhere else and you would be questioning a) the training and b) the ability for a complete non review process before these penalties are sent out.</p>
<p>How bad can it be, well one poor sole in Cambridge obviously has an obsessive stalker in the form of HMRC as he received <strong>52</strong> envelopes from HMRC, each containing <strong>4</strong> letters demanding sums ranging from £100 to £3,000 (grand total £39,000).</p>
<p>The taxpayer is appealing the fines, which have been suspended pending a final decision.</p>
<p>HMRC told the Cambridge News:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Incorrectly issued penalties are not the result of a system problem but failure to correctly follow procedure &#8211; this is being put right.</em>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eicg.co.uk/taxadvice/inland-revenue-penalty-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

